Confession: I had never been big into politics. I went to a liberal arts college where it was “cool” to get involved in student government and politics and people who didn’t understand the complexities of the Iraq war were looked down upon, but even then, I couldn’t bring myself to invest time in watching the news. Too depressing, I said, as I returned to my book.
But as I’ve gotten older, it’s become clear that ignorance, blissful as it may be, is not an option if you want to be a responsible human in the world. By “responsible human” I mean someone who cares about herself, her friends and family, and strangers. Who does what she can to improve things not only for those close to her, but for those she’s never met.
You can’t ignore politics if you want to be a responsible human. Like it or not, the stuff they do up on high will affect you, those around you, and those far-flung from you in one way, shape, or form, somewhere on down the line.
Which brings me to our current election.
I decided to write about this here because I don’t think it’s being covered enough on the internet. (HAHAHAHAHA).
Really, I decided to write this here despite my deep desire not to, because:
“We must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Sometimes we must interfere.”
I personally will not stand to lose much if Donald Trump becomes president. I have paid off my student loan debt. I make decent money in an industry that’s not going anywhere (the internet). I am straight. I am Christian. I am white. I am not an immigrant. (My ancestors were, of course, but I am a third generation American on one side, umpteenth generation on the other, and frankly, if someone wanted to ship me back to “where I came from”, I’ve been to Italy, Ireland, Germany, and England, and found them all lovely.)
Politics are polarizing. Politics are infuriating, even for me, having lived all my life in blue states (New Jersey, Massachusetts, New York) and countries (France) where a liberal mindset is the norm. I can count on one hand the number of Trump supporters I know in real life. Three fit into the category of old, white relatives who watch Fox News. Two fit into the category of devout Catholics who vote on pro-life stances only. When I talk about politics in person with people, I’m mostly preaching to the choir. Which is why I decided to do it here, on the internet (a scary, scary place).
So here are my points to address those people:
If you think that Mr. Trump is a better candidate than Hillary Clinton because Clinton supports Planned Parenthood, I encourage you to read this article. There’s very little I can say better than that eloquent blogger, but the main takeaway is that pro-life should mean doing what is best for all people.
If you are racist, I’m aware there’s probably not much I can say to change your mind (except: read a history book. Being racist doesn’t turn out well for the racists, ever.) However, if you reject the idea that Trump is racist 1) it’s not true and 2) it’s less his personal racism that concerns me. It’s that of some of his followers.
I’m alarmed by Mr. Trumps xenophobia, misogyny, racism, ignorance, lack of honesty, lack of policy, lack of experience, etc. etc., but more than that, I’m alarmed by the following he’s gained. My naïveté and privilege are showing, but I truly thought that white supremacy was a thing perpetrated by a few fringe lunatics in the deep south or somewhere equally far away from me who were slowly dying out. But having spent (perhaps too much) time on Twitter lately and watching this happen in real time, I know now that that’s not true.
(By the way, if you want to know what happens if you jump into the fray thinking there’s nothing neo-Nazis can say to you when you are a white, straight, Christian woman, you will just get garden-variety sexual harassment. Lesson learned.)
Another concerning thing? The willful ignorance I’ve witnessed among some Trump followers, exemplified best in this video. Facts are important. Information is important. Intelligence is important. Especially when deciding who will be leading the free world.
Look, I am well aware that Hillary Clinton isn’t perfect. She’s made mistakes in the number of years she’s been a politician, not the least of which are voting for the Iraq war, using a private email server, and being dishonest about her emails. The latter is actually quite concerning to me. Yet Mrs. Clinton has done something Donald Trump has never done: admitted wrongdoing, apologized, and decided to learn from her mistakes.
(And if your response to this is: Third party! Quick note on third party candidates: 1) Neither of the two being touted as options have solid policies or enough experience to be president and 2) They have no chance of winning. It will be Clinton or Trump. “But the two-party system sucks, etc. etc.” That may be true, but it will not change the outcome of this particular election. That is simply a fact.)
And when it comes down to it, I’m more concerned with what these candidates will do than the things they have done. I’m concerned about climate change. I’m concerned about gun control. I’m concerned about the people around the world who need our help. I’m concerned about terrorism–and I don’t believe that shutting our borders and leaving those people to fend for themselves is the way to stamp it out. I think that’s the way to grow terrorists. I’m concerned about the poor in our own country. And I’m concerned about minorities, Muslims, immigrants, and LBGTQ people here as well, and what a Trump presidency would do to their rights and the overall sentiment towards them from their fellow Americans.
As shown in the debates last night, one candidate has solid plans to address all of this. One candidate has 1) plans (such as trickle down economics) that have already been proven not to work 2) no plans and 3) plans that are actively harmful to people.
There is one thing standing between us and a Trump presidency: Hillary Clinton. So in case it’s not obvious from my Twitter feed or my book choices or my propensity for travel or from the kind of person I have hopefully presented myself to be through this blog, I just wanted to state it unequivocally here:
Image via Erin’s blog
10 thoughts on “I’m With Her”
The sad thng about this whole election is that very few voters will even bother to read up on the candidates policies. Also both sides could feel the other side is “willfully ignorant”.
Agreed that people not reading up on things themselves from credible sources is a huge problem. I’ve spent a good amount of time reading up on Benghazi and the emails and everything else people like to throw at Clinton. I’ve also spent a good amount of time reading up on Trump and all his alleged faults, and what it comes down to is that his faults far outweigh hers. But as I said, it also comes down to what they plan to do, and her plans are far more sound.
Well said! I agree with all your points.
I too am extremely disappointed that Mr. Trump has gained so much momentum based on hate. I never thought anyone in my direct circle at least felt animosity towards any minorities.
I also loved that Sec. Clinton came up with a game plan rather than playing at people’s emotions. I think she almost counted on him becoming unhinged.
Scary situation; the instability is deafening.
LikeLiked by 1 person
2) it’s less his personal racism that concerns me. It’s that of his followers.
I don’t usually get involved with political conversations because it is so devisive. But I find it offensive no matter what side of politics you are on to accuse someone that is not voting for your candidate of things that are false. I am not racists and I am not ignorant as you seem to think we are “the willful ignorance”. I am educated and a professional.
However our political differences are I think categorizing people in that way is wrong. Belittling is wrong and not justified in any situation.
Your post would of held more value had it just been on the reason for your support of Hillary then your demeaning of Trump supporters.
Perhaps I should have clarified that by “that of his followers”, I don’t mean *all* of his followers. I mean those ones I have encountered personally throughout the internet, the ones referenced in that article of the writer I know. It’s factual to say that he has racist followers, and his candidacy has emboldened them; just read that article for proof. I’m aware it’s not factual to say *all* of his followers are racist.
I don’t mean to be belittling or insulting. I also don’t believe that every Trump supporter is willfully ignorant (though those in the example I linked to certainly are.) I am honestly just completely baffled by anyone who can in good conscience support Trump given his policies are either non-existent or don’t make any sense. If someone wanted to explain to me why Trump would be a better president, supported by facts, from credible sources, I would listen. In contrast, a lot of Trump supporters I’ve encountered on the internet have no interest in facts or sources (as shown in that video).
I focus on what’s wrong with Trump more than what’s right about Hillary, mostly because she wasn’t my first choice candidate, either. She’s not many people’s first choice. However, it’s not people who were always on board with her who need convincing. My point is that no matter what people have against her, with all her flaws, she’s so clearly a much, much better candidate than Trump.
This isn’t a normal election. It’s perhaps the most important one we will ever vote in and I’m absolutely terrified at the prospect of a Trump presidency. So I’m dong my part, however tiny, to do what I can to ensure that doesn’t happen, and I do apologize if I’ve offended you along the way, but I don’t take back anything that I said.
I did just amend it to say *some* followers, as you make a good point there; in no way can I claim to know the minds of *all* his followers.
I still don’t understand why anyone would vote for him, however.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You can be educated and also be “willfully ignorant”. “Willfully ignorant” means actively choosing to ignore information that contradicts with what you would prefer to believe. I have to actively fight my personal echo chamber to make sure I read and absorb different sides of issues because I never want to be that.
There are people who say they are voting for Trump because they are choosing to believe he won’t actually do the things he’s saying once he’s in office. If that is not willfully ignorant I don’t know what is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perfectly stated, thank you